‘Well, you want us to vote, so we’ll vote no.’ ”But Ginsburg, who in the past has expressed support for Garland to fill the seat of her late friend and colleague Justice Antonin Scalia, disagreed with Senate Republicans who have said Obama should not nominate a replacement and that the vacancy should be filled by the next president.“I do think cooler heads will prevail, I hope sooner rather than later,” Ginsburg said. Circuit. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Wednesday that senators refusing to vote on President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court should recognize … All Rights Reserved. No opinion is written, no reasons are given, and the affirmance has no precedential value,” Ginsburg said. By signing up you are agreeing to our Everyone's Marveling Over This Jaw-Dropping Video Starring a Skateboarding ProdigyPostal Service Considers Downsizing: Senator and Union LeaderYou can unsubscribe at any time. “Even if you could conceive of a testing lawsuit, what would the response be? In the future I will be more circumspect.”In an interview with the New York Times, Ginsburg called Garland “about as well qualified as any nominee to this court” and, when asked whether senators should act on the nomination, said, “That’s their job.”Obama nominated Garland on March 16, but Republican Senate leaders have refused even to hold a hearing. I thought that Merrick Garland … Politics “It’s just as though we denied review.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s health scare raised the question of how the Senate would handle a Supreme Court vacancy in a presidential election year. By Or purchase a subscription for unlimited access to real news you can count on. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Wednesday that senators refusing to vote on President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court should recognize that a president is elected for four years not three.But she also told incoming law students at Georgetown University that she did not see how a lawsuit from supporters of the nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, trying to force the Senate to act could accomplish their desired outcome.In response to a question, Ginsburg said the president’s power to nominate Supreme Court justices is contingent on the advice and consent of the Senate.“If the Senate is not acting, what can be done about it?” Ginsburg asked rhetorically. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is confident "cooler heads will prevail" when it comes to the Senate taking action on President Barack Obama's nominee for the high court. In the interview, which aired Monday and Tuesday, Rose noted that the next president will now have the opportunity to appoint a new justice.“That’s one scenario. (Craig Fritz/AP)Keep supporting great journalism by turning off your ad blocker.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presents onstage at a reception before an event at the Temple Emanu-El Skirball Center on Sept. 21, 2016 in New York City. The Supreme Court stops hearing cases in April, convening in May and June only to announce orders and opinions.The eight justices have been relatively quiet on the subject this year, though Ginsburg has praised Garland and Garland has now waited nearly seven months for a confirmation hearing—longer than any other Supreme Court nominee.
Supreme Court Upholds Nevada Church Limits Amid COVID-19Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know now on politics, health and more Garland’s clerks regularly are chosen by the justices to work for them as well, including by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who served with Garland on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. October 12, 2016 4:22 PM EDT The other possibility is after the election, the Senate will act,” Ginsburg said, suggesting that the Senate could hold hearings for Garland during the lame-duck session between November’s presidential election and the inauguration on Jan. 20.Asked what she would like the Senate to do, Ginsburg demurred.“I would like to see the court have a full house by the time this term ends,” she said. And in her interview with Rose, Ginsburg emphasized the court’s need for a ninth justice soon.“Eight is not a good number for a collegial body that sometimes disagrees,” Ginsburg said.In instances when the court is divided, an even number of justices makes it difficult for the Supreme Court to issue a binding judgment and resolve conflicts among lower courts, she said.“What we do is we automatically affirm the decision of the court below. Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the Senate has an obligation to hold hearings and a vote on the Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland “That’s their job,” she said. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presents onstage at a reception before an event at the Temple Emanu-El Skirball Center on Sept. 21, 2016 in New York City.