Now you might wonder how cumulative numbers could be so high if the new daily intake is so low? Understanding math, geography, and continuity of data observations is much more important to getting the truth about the virus than any knowledge about medicine and science. What This chart from Arizona’s coronavirus dashboard says it all.Check out what happens in Arizona when you do a 7d rolling aver of hospitalization to case rate (using a 7-day lag), in Red, overlaid with 7d ave pct of cases to tests, Blue. Obviously, if the same number of patients of all conditions had come in to hospitals six weeks ago and we had had the rapid testing capabilities, the number of positive cases would have been recorded as even higher than they are today.This dichotomy is likely reflected in the following chart of COVID-positive patients admitted to the emergency rooms.How can it be that the same government website showing literally no more than five new COVID-19 admissions a day this week also shows record emergency room COVID-positive patients? We are joined by a math guru today to explain how data is being manipulated to tell a story that doesn’t reflect reality. Ep 676 | Understanding the Math Manipulation of the False COVID Panic It also explains why so many people in the hospital are now being pegged as COVID-19 patients when they are in the hospital for other reasons. It’s hard to compare state data when some states are getting backwash from other countries’ cases.
As Brownsville public health director Arturo Rodriguez According to the Post, “approximately half of the coronavirus patients in several California border hospitals, including El Centro Regional Medical Center, are recent arrivals from Mexico.” Which is why Imperial County has more cases per capita than any other county in the state.This explains why some of the largest spikes in cases and even some new deaths have been in border counties, The media, as always, are engaging in headline panic news and fudging math that proves the exact opposite of their headlines. The truth is that new hospitalizations of people coming in for serious coronavirus infections are actually extremely low. We are joined by a math guru today to explain how data is being manipulated to tell a story that doesn’t reflect reality. He is listed as a contributor to Criminal Law, Practice & Procedure. Daniel Horowitz is a Senior Editor at Conservative Review Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Are Child Abuse The ER patients are coming in, as the Arizona state health director, Dr. Cara Christ, The very states that are seeing increases in hospitalizations are the ones that barely had patients – COVID-19 or otherwise – for six weeks because the virus didn’t hit hard but the panic and suspension of certain procedures caused the admissions to plummet (unlike in New York, for example, where there were enough COVID-19 patients to fill hospitals).
The health “experts” and the media propagating viral panic porn think people like us don’t understand arithmetic. Had we been testing every person in March and April, there likely would have been many more cases.Hence, the dichotomy between those “hospitalized with COVID-19” and those hospitalized The same trend we see in Arizona is playing out in Texas and likely in other states that had both low COVID-19 numbers and very few general patients in hospitals during the peak of the epidemic.This is from Texas 2036. 1,493 talking about this. Follow him on Twitter The total number of “positive” COVID-19 patients currently using beds in the hospital system is high. Hospitalizations cut off June 6 (correspond to May 31). One other factor driving the discovery of more cases is the now widespread serology tests that discover antibodies in many people who never knew they had the virus. Daniel Aaron Horowitz (born December 14, 1954) is an American defense attorney who has represented several high-profile clients including talk show host Michael Savage and is a frequent commentator in the media on criminal cases in the news. In 2014 Horowitz was named a Top 100 Lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers. Is 'Black-on-Black' Crime a Myth?