In the EU, presently only Spain and Portugal prohibit anonymous reporting. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, asserted the American people have the right to know the person who is trying to bring down the president for whom 63 million voted.“It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions,” he said.Added Jordan: “The people want to know. Congress knows. "Trump and his Republican allies have long sought to out the anonymous whistleblower who used official channels to raise concerns about a July 25 phone conversation in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who is now a leading Democratic presidential candidate.Lawyers for the whistleblower and Democrats have accused Trump and other Republicans of jeopardizing the personal security of the person by seeking to publicize the name.
inspector general on Aug. 12, but it was not publicly released until Sept. 26.Prior to filing, he had met with Schiff’s Democratic staff for “guidance.” At first, the California lawmaker denied the contacts, but later admitted that his office did, in fact, meet with the whistleblower early on.Earlier this year, Schiff recruited two of Ciaramella’s closest allies at the NSC — both whom were also Obama holdovers — to join his committee staff. Enter City/ZIP
It alleged that an official at the White House National Security Council (NSC) conspired with a Democratic staffer of the House Intelligence Committee, which spearheaded the impeachment inquiry.But Paul first pointed out that the question, while using the name of an NSC official reported by conservative media to be the whistleblower, did not actually identify the person as such. The Washington Post knows. The CIA analyst's name is …
Contributions are NOT tax-deductible.
My question did not talk about anybody who was a whistleblower. "They made a big mistake not allowing my question.
Follow President Donald Trump as he shapes America’s futureWASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters) - Republican Senator Rand Paul gave the purported name of the anonymous whistleblower at the center of President Donald Trump's impeachment in a speech in the Senate on Tuesday, after earlier being blocked from doing so during Trump's trial.Paul uttered the name in a question that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts had earlier declined to read as the presiding officer of the trial.
I want to get to the truth.”In an open House Natural Resources Committee hearing last week, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) seemingly out of left field asked a witness about “Eric Ciaramella of the Obama National Security Council,” in what the Washington press corps took as a bid to out the whistleblower.
CIA spokesman Luis Rossello declined comment, saying, “Anything on the whistleblower, we are referring to ODNI.” The Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not respond to requests for comment.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff argued the whistleblower’s complaint, though admittedly based on second-hand information, amounts to an impeachable offense, and they subsequently launched an impeachment inquiry that has largely been conducted in secret.The whistleblower filed his “urgent” report against Trump with the I.C. I agree with you on the speeding, but I'm compelled…I fully agree. “In the days after Comey’s firing, this presidential action was used to further political and media calls for the standup [sic] of the special counsel to investigate ‘Russia collusion.’ “In the end, Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no conspiracy between Trump and Putin.
“My recollection of Eric is that he was very smart and very passionate, particularly about Ukraine and Russia.
Although the company can and should try to protect the whistleblower from retaliation, there is always some risk.